Crime scales without limits. Investigations do not.
Azonic is the operating system for intelligence. It gives government and enterprise teams tackling online crime one platform for investigation and monitoring, so analysts can follow more leads, progress more cases in parallel and see threats earlier.
More reports. More sources. The same people doing the work.
Investigators are asked to find the people behind online crime, connect activity across platforms and establish what the evidence supports. Too much of their time goes into moving between tools, repeating searches and assembling the record by hand. Each new referral adds to work that is already waiting.
US$20.9bn
Internet-crime losses reported to the FBI
Losses reported to the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center in 2025 rose 26% from 2024.
FBI IC3 Annual Report 2025, p. 621.3m
Reports of suspected child sexual exploitation
Received by NCMEC's CyberTipline in 2025 from the public and online service providers.
NCMEC CyberTipline Report 2025, p. 453,000+
Urgent reports escalated to law enforcement
Within NCMEC's 2025 reports, more than 53,000 were escalated as urgent or involving a child in imminent danger.
NCMEC CyberTipline Report 2025, p. 5Behind every report is work someone has to do. Identify the actor. Follow the connections. Establish the evidence. Decide what needs to happen next.
The tools have multiplied.
The work is still manual.
The constraint is rarely a lack of information. It is the time and attention required to turn it into an investigation.
The information is spread across disconnected tools.
An investigation can start with a username, a referral or a suspicious account. Following it means searching public sources, checking internal records and consulting separate intelligence services. Analysts move between those systems, copy findings and reconcile conflicting information themselves. The effort goes into assembling the picture before they can assess what it means or decide which lead deserves their attention next.
Manual work makes every new case compete with the last.
Collection, cross-checking and documentation are essential, but repeating them by hand limits how much a team can investigate. An analyst working through one case has less time to progress another. Referrals wait while active investigations need follow-up, evidence needs organising and reports need preparing. Adding another tool does little to help when the analyst still has to operate every part of the process.
A threat can develop between searches.
Accounts change, networks move and new activity appears while investigators are working elsewhere. When monitoring depends on someone returning to a search, relevant changes can go unseen. Teams need a way to keep watch across their priorities, recognise activity that warrants attention and carry its context into an investigation. That awareness has to continue while analysts focus on the decisions already in front of them.
Give investigators the capacity to act.
More intelligence. Not more information.
Azonic runs collection, correlation and monitoring across your cases in parallel. Investigators direct the work, assess the findings and approve what leaves their organisation.
Four stages.
One connected record.
Each stage carries its context into the next, so the analyst spends less time rebuilding the work and more time deciding where it should go.
Triage incoming leads.
Bring incoming reports, referrals and identifiers into a shared workflow. Azonic adds relevant context and helps prioritise the queue against the criteria your organisation sets. Analysts can see why an item needs attention, review the supporting information and decide what should become an investigation. The starting material and the decision stay together, so the person taking the case forward can understand how it began.
A prioritised queue with context behind each lead.
Investigate across sources.
Follow a lead across open sources, connected agency systems and Azonic's proprietary intelligence. Collection and correlation bring relevant accounts, people and activity into the case, while investigative work can progress across multiple cases. Analysts direct what to pursue, review the connections and correct the interpretation. The work stays in one place, reducing the need to move findings between separate tools and reconstruct the investigation afterwards.
A connected case that the investigator can steer.
Keep the evidence with the finding.
Examine what supports a finding before relying on it. Sources, collected material and the record of how they were obtained stay attached to the case. Analysts can review corroborating information, challenge a conclusion and distinguish supported findings from leads that need more work. That record gives colleagues and reviewers a way to follow the reasoning without asking the investigator to rebuild the trail from notes and screenshots.
Findings that can be traced back to their supporting evidence.
Review, report and share.
Turn the investigation into a report with citations back to the work that supports it. The analyst reviews the findings and the appropriate people approve the release. Share an approved edition with a named recipient under the access controls your organisation sets. The recipient receives a defined record of the findings, while the investigation retains its sources, history and the decisions behind what was shared.
A reviewed report with a clear record of what was released.
Investigate what you know.
Discover what needs attention.
Vantage
The investigation platform.
Vantage takes an investigation from the first lead to a reviewed report. Start with a report, referral or identifier. Vantage follows leads across sources and builds a case with evidence attached to each finding, working across cases while your analysts direct the next steps. Your team reviews the conclusions, prepares a cited report and shares an approved edition under your organisation's controls. From triage to reporting, the record stays connected to the work that produced it.
Lighthouse
Monitoring and insights.
Lighthouse keeps watch on the threats, actors and activity your team sets, flags what changes and builds insight over time. Alerts arrive with their context, and your team decides what warrants action and what needs a closer look. Use Lighthouse on its own, or take a lead into Vantage with its context intact. Monitoring continues while investigators focus on the cases that need their judgement.
More capacity for the work
only investigators can do.
Progress more cases with the team you have.
Let collection, correlation and monitoring progress in parallel. Investigators can spend more of their attention assessing findings, choosing the next step and moving cases towards a decision.
See relevant activity as it develops.
Keep watch across the threats and actors in your remit. Give analysts context when something changes, so they can decide whether it calls for a response or further investigation.
Make the work easier to review and carry forward.
Keep sources, reasoning and approvals with the case. Colleagues and supervisors can understand what has been established, what remains uncertain and what supports the next decision.
Automation with accountability.
Investigators remain responsible for the decisions. Work runs within defined limits, sources stay attached to findings, and review and approval are part of the workflow. Azonic gives analysts the means to examine, challenge and correct what the platform produces.
Different responsibilities.
The same need to understand.
AZONIC FOR GOVERNMENT
For the agencies investigating crime.
Law enforcement, intelligence agencies and regulators face growing volumes of referrals and increasingly connected threats. Azonic supports the work of identifying actors, following activity across sources and producing an evidenced record that can move an investigation forward.
- Law enforcement and intelligence
- Regulators and government agencies
AZONIC FOR ENTERPRISE
For the organisations crime targets.
An alert is often only the beginning. Financial crime, fraud, corporate security and trust-and-safety teams need to understand the actors and networks behind incidents. Azonic connects that work to the evidence colleagues, regulators and law enforcement need to assess it.
- Banks and financial services
- Corporate investigations
- Social media and gaming
Within your organisation's infrastructure.
Deploy in your own environment, self-hosted or in your cloud infrastructure. Your organisation sets access, oversight and the authority under which the work takes place. Discuss your requirements.
Built with an understanding
of the work.
Azonic was founded by Caden Scott and Thomas Holdom in Auckland, New Zealand. Caden founded the International Online Crime Coordination Center (IOC3), a non-profit connecting agencies and online platforms working on online crime. Thomas leads the engineering of the platform.
Caden Scott
Co-Founder & CEO
Thomas Holdom
Co-Founder & CTO
What could your team do
with more capacity?
Tell us about your investigations, the systems you work with and where the work slows down. We’ll discuss how Azonic could fit.
A conversation about your problem set.